Historically
Indian judiciary has enjoyed highest amount of independence and has been held
least accountable, but this never meet that the judiciary can be allowed to be
can imperia in case of any erosion of values in judiciary, law must heavily
come down.
Judges should be held accountable, since depletion of values in
judiciary.
So far, more deplorable, but what mechanism should be adopted for
judicial accountability?
Which actions will attract accountability? In Indian
scenario, what is the status of the judicial accountability?
What should be
done to improve the situation and how far the 2006 Bill ensure accountability?
These are the aspects of primarily dealt by this Article. Judicial
accountability, as a concept, is much debated. Since, it is very difficult to
law in precise words as a term in simplest it means answerability or
responsibility.
It is conception and methods vary from one Nation to other,
depending on the situations prevailing. Traditionally, most of the
constitutions provide process of impeachment of judges for ensure judicial
accountability.
But impeachment is a process but it is not sound soul
sufficient to deal with judicial accountability. The two prime questions to be
answered while framing a model of accountability are:
1. 1. the
method to be adopted which will ensure accountability without impairing the
Independence of Judiciary
2. Whether
Accountability is for administrative function? Or judicial function? Or both?
2. The answers to these questions will be given
in the explanation.
0 comments:
Post a Comment